Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Biological Procedures Online and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Short report

Media composition influences yeast one- and two-hybrid results

Ying Liu1, Zabeena Merchant1, Hao-Ching Hsiao2, Kim L Gonzalez2, Kathleen S Matthews1 and Sarah E Bondos12*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005 USA

2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843 USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Biological Procedures Online 2011, 13:6  doi:10.1186/1480-9222-13-6

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biologicalproceduresonline.com/content/13/1/6


Received:3 May 2011
Accepted:15 August 2011
Published:15 August 2011

© 2011 Liu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Although yeast two-hybrid experiments are commonly used to identify protein interactions, the frequent occurrence of false negatives and false positives hampers data interpretation. Using both yeast one-hybrid and two-hybrid experiments, we have identified potential sources of these problems: the media preparation protocol and the source of the yeast nitrogen base may not only impact signal range but also effect whether a result appears positive or negative. While altering media preparation may optimize signal differences for individual experiments, media preparation must be reported in detail to replicate studies and accurately compare results from different experiments.

Keywords:
Yeast one-hybrid; yeast two-hybrid; protein-protein interaction; accuracy; false positive; false negative

Findings

The yeast two-hybrid system provides an efficient method for identifying novel protein·protein interactions in small-scale studies and high-throughput screens [1-3]. In this system, the first hybrid is composed of a bait protein fused to a DNA binding protein that recognizes DNA sequences upstream of a lacZ reporter gene. The second hybrid protein consists of a strong activation domain fused to a potential protein partner. Interaction between bait and partner proteins localizes the strong activation domain to the lacZ promoter, thus activating transcription of the lacZ reporter gene. Multiple cycles of lacZ transcription, translation, and β-galactosidase cleavage of X-gal generate visible quantities of the blue assay product, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-hydroxyindole. This sensitive system detects interactions that may be difficult to observe by other means (e.g., co-immunoprecipitation) due to low abundance of the protein complex.

The sensitivity of this method can also lead to several problems: (i) transformation efficiency affects signal strength and is highly dependent on technique [3], (ii) 25% to 50% of detected interactions are estimated to be false positives [2,4,5], and (iii) 55% to 90% of true protein interactions are not observed (false negatives) [2,5]. Furthermore, differences in protein abundance can visibly impact outcome [6,7]. Given these difficulties, it is perhaps not surprising that laboratories using similar assays report different protein interactions [2,5].

Identifying sensitive parameters in yeast two-hybrid experiments could help address these difficulties. Herein, we report both the source of media components and the media preparation protocol can impact yeast one-hybrid and two-hybrid results. In the yeast one-hybrid system, the bait protein, which includes a transcription activation domain, is fused to a DNA binding protein [1]. When the protein of interest is hybridized to a DNA binding domain, this assay can be used to assess the presence and strength of an activation domain [8]. Alternately, the protein of interest can be hybridized to a strong activation domain to screen for DNA binding [9]. The yeast one-hybrid method requires transformation of only one plasmid, resulting in improved transformation efficiency and fewer cellular manipulations [3]. This simpler experimental design reduces experimental variability, allowing focus on systematic issues that arise using this method.

Experimental Design

Media were prepared according to the protocol in Additional File 1 with varying parameters as discussed below. EGY48-p8op-lacZ yeast were transformed as previously described [4,8,10]. The genome of this reporter host strain (EGY48) includes a wild-type LEU2 gene under the control of a series of LexA operators. The reporter plasmid p8op-lacZ, which carries the lacZ gene under the control of LexA operators, had been stably transformed into this strain [8]. For each DNA tested, cells from a single transformation were divided between plates for each condition to ensure that commonly cited error sources, such as interactions with endogenous proteins, autoactivation, and low transformation efficiencies [1-5], did not contribute to differences in results. The resulting blue color of yeast colonies, which reflects the level of transcription activation, was gauged with a standard color chart (Additional File 2). Analysis by color chart yielded data comparable to analysis by enzyme assay. All experiments were repeated at least three times and yielded consistent results. Yeast nitrogen base sources were Sigma (Y1251-100G), Difco (233520), and Clontech (630421).

Additional file 1. Detailed protocol for yeast media preparation.

Format: PDF Size: 26KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional file 2. Color scale for evaluating yeast colony color, and color scale data compared with data assaying the activity of the β-galactosidase reporter gene product.

Format: PDF Size: 20KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Effects of Yeast Nitrogen Base Source on Yeast-One Hybrid Experiments

We first compared media in which the yeast nitrogen base (YNB) was produced by different companies and the pH was adjusted after sterilization to ensure consistency between media preparations. In general, media made with YNB from Sigma yielded the strongest signal in yeast one-hybrid experiments, whereas media made with Difco YNB yielded intermediate results, and media made with Clontech YNB produced the weakest signal (Table 1 Conditions 1-3). We began experiments using pLexA-Gal4, in which DNA encoding the LexA DNA binding domain is fused to DNA for the Gal4 transcription activation domain. Expression of this hybrid protein should produce a strong positive signal. At only 48 hours post-transformation, yeast colonies transformed with pLexA-Gal4 appeared light blue on media made with Sigma and Difco, whereas colonies on the Clontech media remained white. After 60 hours post-transformation, pLexA-Gal4 colonies on Sigma and Difco media were medium blue, and the colonies on the Clontech media were light blue. Although the results from Difco and Clontech media became indistinguishable after 72 hours, colonies on the Sigma plates were still darker blue. While the source of YNB made a consistent difference, using different lots from the same supplier had no impact on results (Additional File 3).

Table 1. Yeast one-hybrid results are strongly dependent on media.

Additional file 3. Different lots of yeast nitrogen base from the same supplier yield consistent results.

Format: PDF Size: 17KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

To determine whether this media effect is unique to LexA-Gal4, we next tested LexA-Ubx, in which LexA is fused to the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx), which activates transcription at a moderate level to yield medium blue colonies [8]. Colonies transformed with pLexA-Ubx yielded a similar trend as pLexA-Gal4: colonies on media containing Sigma and Difco YNB were the first to show blue color (Table 1 Conditions 1-3).

As a negative control, we used LexA-Pro2 in which LexA is fused to a Ubx variant containing mutations A223P/Q224P/T225P/A228P, which disrupt a predicted α-helix required for transcription activation [8]. Importantly, these proline mutants also prevent transcription activation by Ubx in a promoter-reporter assay in Drosophila S2 cells, corroborating the yeast results [8]. Whereas we expected colonies expressing LexA-Pro2 to be white, colonies grown on all three types of media were light blue after 72 hours. Consequently, the sensitivity of the signal to changes in media appears to depend on the strength of transcription activation: the strongest activator, LexA-Gal4, generated the largest differences, whereas results for the weakest activator, Pro2, were independent of YNB source for this media preparation method.

Based on our prior results, we expected to see a wide range of color: dark blue (++++) for LexA-Gal4, medium blue (+++) for LexA-Ubx, and white (-) for LexA-Pro2 [8]. However, the results for wild-type and mutant Ubx were similar at 72 hours post-transformation in all three conditions. Furthermore, colonies expressing LexA-Gal4 were lighter than expected when grown on Clontech and Difco media. Thus, the range of signal strengths appears poor for Conditions 1-3 (Table 1).

Effects of Adjusting Media pH on Yeast-One Hybrid Experiments

Strikingly, simply not readjusting the pH after sterilization resulted in amplification of the signal range. Comparing results for wild-type and mutant Ubx, a slight difference in signal was again observed in Sigma media which persisted to 72 hours (Table 1, Condition 4). However, using Difco YNB without pH re-adjustment not only increased the signal range at 72 hours but also matched prior results in yeast and Drosophila cell culture [8]. Specifically, for Condition 3 (Difco, no pH adjustment), the data ranged from light blue (++, Ubx and Pro-2) to medium blue (+++, Gal4), whereas for Condition 6 (Difco, pH adjustment), the data ranged from white (-, Pro-2) to dark blue (++++, Gal4).

Even without readjusting the pH, media using YNB sources did not replicate previous data in yeast and Drosophila cell culture. Consequently, media choice can influence the prevalence of false positives and false negatives. Expression of the LexA-Gal4 positive control correctly yielded a strong positive signal at 48 hours on Sigma media, but a false negative signal on Difco media. Likewise, although LexA-Ubx expression rapidly generates a positive signal on Sigma plates, expression of LexA-Ubx on Difco plates gives a false negative response at 60 hours post-transformation, although a positive signal eventually develops after longer incubations. Consequently, the researcher could miss this signal, since the pLexA-Gal4 positive control produces signal at 60 hours. Conversely, the Ubx mutant Pro-2, which should not activate transcription, yields a false positive signal on Sigma media at after 60 hours incubation. Therefore, by not re-adjusting the pH after autoclaving, we observed a greater overall range of signal, greater media-dependent differences in signal, and greater differences in signal between transcription activators of different strengths.

Media Effects on Yeast-Two Hybrid Experiments

Given that the source of the YNB had a profound impact on the results observed in a yeast one-hybrid assay, we reasoned that differences in media might partially account for the variations in data originating from different laboratories in yeast two-hybrid experiments [2,3]. Testing this possibility, we examined the impact of the media source in yeast two-hybrid experiments using a set of control plasmids, in which the T-Antigen-B42 activator chimera should bind a LexA-p53 chimera but not a LexA-Lamin chimera. Similar to yeast one-hybrid experiments, we found the results of yeast two-hybrid data were also dependent on media (Table 2). At five days after transformation, only media produced with Clontech YNB yielded a positive signal, and at six days after transformation, colonies on Clontech media had the strongest signal and Sigma media consistently yielded the weakest signal. Surprisingly, this trend is opposite that observed for yeast one-hybrid experiments, suggesting either the two experimental methods are differentially sensitive, or the magnitude of the media effect is influenced by the proteins assayed.

Table 2. The source of yeast nitrogen base also impacts yeast two-hybrid results.

In summary, we have demonstrated that i) media components and preparation methods influence yeast one- and two-hybrid experiments, ii) for yeast one-hybrid experiments, this media sensitivity scales with increasing activation domain strength, and iii) media can determine the range of signal observed in yeast lacZ reporter assays. Such differences are sufficient to change data interpretation: experiments that should yield a negative result may appear positive, or vice versa. We observed media-dependent effects in four systems: yeast one-hybrid experiments using either the Gal4 activation domain, wild-type Ubx, or a Ubx mutant lacking activity, and finally yeast two-hybrid experiments reporting on the p53·T-antigen interaction. Therefore, this media sensitivity occurs across a wide range of yeast experiments and may contribute to differences in yeast two-hybrid results observed previously [2,11]. Our results for a single yeast nitrogen base source are consistent even when testing different lot numbers or chemicals differing in age by a decade, suggesting that the differences we observe when the source of the yeast nitrogen base is changed are significant. Since each manufacturer reports the same yeast nitrogen base composition, these differences may be attributed to differences in contaminants of these media components (Table 1). These experiments suggest that careful reporting of chemical sources and preparation methods for yeast media is essential to enable replication of experiments and comparison of data between studies. Finally, these media-dependent differences in results could be exploited to enhance and thus verify weak differences in signals from yeast assays.

Competing interests Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

YL discovered the media effect on yeast one- and two-hybrid results. ZM, HCH, and KG collected the remaining data and edited the text. KM and SB wrote and edited the text. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Xin-Xing Tan for many of the plasmids used in these experiments. This research was supported by grants from the Robert A. Welch Foundation (C-576) and National Institutes of Health (GM22441) to K.S.M. and from the Texas A&M Health Science Center to S.E.B.

References

  1. Chen G, Shin JA: AhR/Arnt:XRE interaction: Turning false negatives into true positives in the modified yeast one-hybrid assay.

    Anal Biochem 2008, 382:101-106. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y: A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:4569-4574. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Luban J, Goff SP: The yeast two-hybrid system for studying protein-protein interactions.

    Curr Biol 1995, 6:59-64. OpenURL

  4. Bondos SE, Tan XX, Matthews KS: Physical and genetic interactions link Hox function with diverse transcription factors and cell signaling proteins.

    Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:824-834. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Huang H, Jedynak BM, Bader JS: Where have all the interactions gone? Estimating the coverage of two-hybrid protein interaction maps.

    PLoS Comp Biol 2007, 3:e214. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Björklund Å, Light S, Hedin L, Elofsson A: Quantitative assessment of the structural bias in protein-protein interactions assays.

    Proteomics 2008, 8:4657-4667. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Bartel P, Chien CT, Sternglanz R, Fields S: Elimination of false positives that arise in using the two-hybrid system.

    Biotechniques 1993, 14:920-924. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  8. Tan XX, Bondos S, Li L, Matthews KS: Transcription activation by Ultrabithorax Ib protein requires a predicted α-helical region.

    Biochemistry 2002, 41:2774-2785. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Herrmann F, Garriga-Canut M, Baumstartk R, Fajardo-Sanchez E, Cotterell J, Minoche A, Himmelbauer H, Isalan M: p53 Gene repair with zinc finger nucleases optimized by yeast 1-hybrid and validated by solexa sequencing.

    PLoS One 2011, 6:e20913. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Bondos SE, Catanese DJ Jr, Tan XX, Bicknell A, Li L, Matthews KS: Hox transcription factor Ultrabithorax Ib physically and genetically interacts with Disconnected Interacting Protein 1, a double-stranded RNA binding protein.

    J Biol Chem 2004, 279:26433-26444. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Enright AJ, Iliopoulos I, Kyrpides NC, Ouzounis CA: Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events.

    Nature 1999, 402:86-90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Iwabuchi K, Li B, Bartel P, Fields S: Use of the two-hybrid system to identify the domain of p53 involved in oligomerization.

    Oncogene 1993, 8:1693-6. PubMed Abstract OpenURL